Independent since 2019 · No paid placement, ever Rates verified monthly · Updated July 30, 2026
Methodology

How We Rank Phone Plans

Last reviewed July 30, 2026

Every plan in our database is evaluated against the same four pillars on a 0–10 unweighted scale. No carrier pays for placement, and no plan is excluded for editorial reasons. This page documents how we score, verify, and update plans — and the commitments behind those rankings.

For the broader story of why ShopCellPlans exists and how we stay independent, see our About page.

The scoring model

The four pillars

Each plan earns a 0–10 score on every pillar. Here is exactly what we look at in each.

1

Value for Money

We calculate the true effective cost over 12 and 24 months, not just headline pricing.

  • Promotional pricing and how it converts at renewal — a $15/mo first-year plan that jumps to $30 gets credit for both rates
  • Annual prepay discounts and the math at year 2 versus monthly billing
  • Hidden fees, taxes, regulatory charges, and AutoPay credits
  • Family plan economics at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 lines
  • Required add-ons or device financing that affects the real monthly cost
2

Network Reliability & Speed

We evaluate plans on real-world performance, not marketing claims.

  • 5G availability across major U.S. metros and rural markets
  • Real-world download and upload speed tests
  • Deprioritization thresholds and how they affect performance during congestion
  • Coverage consistency across Verizon, T-Mobile, and AT&T
  • MVNO performance versus the underlying carrier network
3

Hotspot & Features

We evaluate the per-line features that affect how a plan actually works in your household.

  • Dedicated hotspot bucket vs. shared with phone data
  • Hotspot throttling thresholds (5 Mbps, 15 Mbps, unlimited)
  • Streaming bundles (Disney, Netflix, Apple TV+, HBO Max)
  • International features — free roaming, day-pass structures, included countries
  • Smartwatch, tablet, and connected-device support
4

Customer Experience

We evaluate the actual experience of being a customer, not just the marketing experience.

  • App usability for self-service account management
  • Port-in friction and number-transfer reliability
  • Support response times across phone, chat, and email
  • Retail walk-in availability versus digital-only structures
  • “Exit friction” — how easy it is to leave the carrier
  • Billing transparency and surprise-charge frequency

How scores are calculated

Each plan receives a 0–10 score on each pillar; the four combine into the single overall rating displayed across the site.

Scores are unweighted.

Value for Money, Network Reliability, Hotspot & Features, and Customer Experience contribute equally to the overall score. We don’t weight categories to favor plans that pay higher commissions or produce specific outcomes.

For category-specific rankings, we apply additional editorial filters that favor the use case:

  • Family plans get extra weight on per-line economics at 4 lines
  • Cheap plans get extra weight on transparent all-in pricing
  • Single-line plans get extra weight on solo-user perks like Apple Watch service inclusion

Scores display to one decimal place (8.4, 9.3, 7.6). Internal calculations may use higher precision; display rounds to one decimal.

Pricing verification

Every pricing claim on this site is verified directly from carrier websites. We don’t rely on third-party aggregators that may be 30–90 days stale.

Major carriers
Verizon, T-Mobile, and AT&T pricing is verified monthly against the carriers’ own pricing pages.
MVNOs
Visible, Mint Mobile, Cricket, US Mobile, and Total Wireless are verified monthly against each MVNO’s own pricing pages.
Promotions
Promotional pricing (switch offers, AutoPay credits, first-year intros) is verified at the time of writing and flagged with end dates where applicable.

When we encounter conflicting claims (carrier marketing versus actual fine print), we cite the fine print. When pricing is “all-in” versus “taxes extra,” we surface that distinction explicitly.

The commitment

Editorial independence in practice

The four-pillar methodology is applied identically to every plan, regardless of commercial relationship. What that looks like:

Unpaid plans still rank highly.
Not every carrier we rank participates in affiliate programs. When a top plan pays no commission, we still rank it where the methodology puts it.
Top commission doesn’t mean top ranking.
Our database includes carriers we earn meaningful commission from — and they don’t always win their categories.
Rankings move against our own interests.
If a lower-commission alternative becomes more compelling, the methodology forces an update, even when it costs us.
We decline preferred-placement offers.
No early-access programs, sponsored reviews, or “for consideration” media kits with implied editorial expectations.

What we don’t do

For transparency, here are the practices we explicitly avoid:

Sponsored content disguised as reviews — every review reflects our independent evaluation.
Pay-to-rank schemes — no carrier can pay to rank higher than the methodology supports.
Affiliate-only ranking lists — our rankings include plans we earn nothing from.
Outdated pricing left to inflate rankings — when a plan’s pricing changes, we update the score.
Inflated scores for paying advertisers — all scores apply identical methodology regardless of commercial relationship.

How we update rankings

Reviews and rankings update continuously based on:

  • Carrier pricing changes
  • Plan feature updates and additions
  • Network performance shifts in real-world testing
  • Reader feedback flagging accuracy issues
  • Our own ongoing methodology refinement

If you encounter a discrepancy between our claims here and what you experience on the site, please reach out. Reader feedback is one of the most valuable inputs we have for keeping the cluster accurate.